Targeted Reading Intervention Rotations Using Screening Data

At Benchmark

52% 71%

+37%

Tier 2→1 Movement

18% 42%

+133%

Group Effectiveness Score

N/A 3.8/5

New

The Problem

Mid-year screening data showed 48% of K-3 students were below benchmark in reading. Intervention existed but was scattershot — students were grouped by classroom rather than by skill deficit. Some students were getting phonics intervention when their gap was fluency. Teachers reported that intervention time felt wasted because groups were too heterogeneous.

The Plan

1

Import screening data and group by specific skill deficit

Not by overall score — a phonics gap is different from a fluency gap. Max 5 students per group.

Data Import Groups Data Wall See example

Elmer Suite → Data Import

roster_spring_2026.csv
342 rows · 12 columns · uploaded just now

✓ 338 matched ⚠ 3 need review ✗ 1 error

Import 338 Students Review Errors

Preview everything before committing. Fix errors before they become problems.
2

30-min daily rotations: intervention + guided + enrichment

All students rotate. Some get targeted intervention, others get enrichment. Nobody is singled out.

30 min/day
3

Regroup every 6 weeks using current data

Students who reach benchmark graduate to enrichment. New students move in. Data drives every decision.

DataDay Data Wall Factors See example

Elmer Suite → Data Wall

StudentMetric 1Metric 2Status

Student A At Risk Watch Flagged

Student B On Track On Track ✓

Stoplight colors show who needs attention at a glance.